Comments on: 3 Predictions for the Future of Web http://debutcreative.com/200/3-predictions-for-the-future-of-web web development studio Fri, 28 May 2010 16:22:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: ArleyM http://debutcreative.com/200/3-predictions-for-the-future-of-web/comment-page-1#comment-16 ArleyM Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:00:25 +0000 http://debutcreative.com/2009/06/3-predictions-for-the-future-of-web/#comment-16 Sometimes a prediction is just a prediction, and not something I necessary think will revolutionize everyone's life. Your points are very valid, but there is lots of room for technology to adapt and change the way we experience things. I guess we'll just have to wait and see! Sometimes a prediction is just a prediction, and not something I necessary think will revolutionize everyone’s life.

Your points are very valid, but there is lots of room for technology to adapt and change the way we experience things.

I guess we’ll just have to wait and see!

]]> By: mattyb http://debutcreative.com/200/3-predictions-for-the-future-of-web/comment-page-1#comment-15 mattyb Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:06:30 +0000 http://debutcreative.com/2009/06/3-predictions-for-the-future-of-web/#comment-15 I can't disagreed more! 1. Audioweb?!?! It's already a video-web! ScreenReaders suck hard dude! Try one, you'll see how horrid they are... They have to read formatting and let you know if it's a link, button or whatever... If you want to take 10X longer to browse a page, go for it. Add AJAX,Javascript and all the new stuff out there... Audioweb "sounds" like a good idea, but fails 2. Surf By Remote? Web TV - Fail PS3 Web - Fail Wii Web - Fail DREAMCAST WEB BROWSER - Fail Media Center Browser - Fail... Here's the problem... you have to type to search something, whether its youtube vids or just a goog-search...and using a remote to do that is rediculous... worse then browsing the web on a non-qwerty phone. Companies have been trying to do this for years... I'd like to see it, but we needs das keyboard for le web! 3. I don't disagree with this one, but I think there's a bigger issue. Domain-Squaters... that's the real problem, 90% of common web urls are squatters just trying to charge more for a domain. We're already seeing urls starting to morph now with .it and .tv ... but that really reallly sucks!!! Those extension are for countries, like .CA is for Canada. It's not for arleysCollectionOfEroti.ca :P I can’t disagreed more!

1. Audioweb?!?! It’s already a video-web! ScreenReaders suck hard dude! Try one, you’ll see how horrid they are… They have to read formatting and let you know if it’s a link, button or whatever… If you want to take 10X longer to browse a page, go for it. Add AJAX,Javascript and all the new stuff out there… Audioweb “sounds” like a good idea, but fails

2. Surf By Remote? Web TV – Fail
PS3 Web – Fail
Wii Web – Fail
DREAMCAST WEB BROWSER – Fail
Media Center Browser – Fail…
Here’s the problem… you have to type to search something, whether its youtube vids or just a goog-search…and using a remote to do that is rediculous… worse then browsing the web on a non-qwerty phone. Companies have been trying to do this for years… I’d like to see it, but we needs das keyboard for le web!

3. I don’t disagree with this one, but I think there’s a bigger issue. Domain-Squaters… that’s the real problem, 90% of common web urls are squatters just trying to charge more for a domain.
We’re already seeing urls starting to morph now with .it and .tv … but that really reallly sucks!!!
Those extension are for countries, like .CA is for Canada.
It’s not for arleysCollectionOfEroti.ca :P

]]>